https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189985 --- Comment #3 from blinxen <h-k-81@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- [fedora-review-service-build] I updated the SPEC + SRPM file and uploaded it to same place. > For Rust packages, the License tag of the main package usually reflects the license of the crate. Could you put this in your list of stuff that you want to add to the Rust Packaging Guidelines :D? > You also shouldn't "simplify" the license that much anymore ... according to latest guidance from Red Hat legal, these licenses: Thanks for the info! Do you have the relevant documentation at hand? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2189985 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
