https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2190039 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Selkowitz <yselkowi@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #5) > a) Is it worth keeping the history from the older spec file? It is, but you can't tell from the downloads. Locally I have the following commits: - Unretire package (iow revert the retirement) - Convert to %autochangelog (which saves the previous history in a changelog file) - Update to 6.4.0 (the remaining changes which results in this spec&SRPM) > b) Is it possible to run tests? Most of the tests require a graphical server, so not worth the trouble IMO. > c) Should gtk-sourceview3 be used rather than gtk-sourceview4? > https://gitlab.gnome.org/swilmet/tepl/-/blob/main/meson.build#L24 That's a new requirement in 6.5+ (development version), doesn't apply to 6.4: https://gitlab.gnome.org/swilmet/tepl/-/blob/6.4.0/meson.build?ref_type=tags#L23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2190039 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
