[Bug 2179404] Review Request: openvkl - Intel Open Volume Kernel Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179404

Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
URL and Source0 are Ok.
TODO: Source0 address does not match what upstream advertise
(<https://github.com/openvkl/openvkl/archive/refs/tags/v1.3.2.tar.gz>) at
<https://github.com/openvkl/openvkl/releases>. Please use that URL listed byt
the upstream.
Source0 archive (SHA-512:
07dad3cf13c4aae18883b02dc6b0e41ba95fffea3f76c2f77ef3b8b55c5e7a8cfe666f88fb8b079cc07af11915ee4292406e42d11123c0f66f1a10413328a911)
is original. Ok.

FIX: Remove the registered marks (Intel®) from Summary and Description texts
<https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_trademarks_in_summary_or_description>.

Licenses found (the files are only examples):
Apache-2.0: utility/vdb/include/openvkl/utility/vdb/VdbVolumeBuffers.h
BSL-1.0: testing/external/catch.hpp
MIT: testing/external/half.hpp
MIT OR Unlicense: examples/interactive/imgui-1.83/imstb_truetype.h
OFL-1.1-RFN: examples/interactive/imgui-1.83/misc/fonts/Karla-Regular.ttf
Zlib: examples/interactive/imgui-1.83/examples/libs/usynergy/uSynergy.h
TODO: If any of the files is built and packaged into a binary RPM package,
their licenses must be mentioned in License tag. Also a corresponding subset of
third-party-programs*.txt files should be packaged with %license macro instead
of %doc macro.

FIX: Build-require "cmake >= 3.1", not "cmake3"
(<https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CMake/>,
CMakeLists.txt:6).
TODO: Constrain 'rkcommon-devel' build-dependency with '>= 1.11.0'
(CMakeLists.txt:66).
TODO: Constrain 'embree-devel' build-dependency with '>= 4.0.0'
(CMakeLists.txt:74).
TODO: Constrain 'openvdb-devel' build-dependency wiht '>= 7.0.0'
(utility/vdb/CMakeLists.txt:42).

TODO: Are tbb-devel and zlib-devel indeed required? They are only referred from
superbuild/CMakeLists.txt which is not used.

I will continue with the review later.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179404
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux