https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188439 --- Comment #6 from Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #5) > Ok, that kind of makes sense. But then you could make it an EPEL-only > package? There's no requirement for EPEL packages to also exist in Fedora. Sure I could. But I think this would make things more consistent and less confusing. But if FPC strongly feels this should be epel-only, I can live with that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188439 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
