https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188439 --- Comment #4 from Lokesh Mandvekar <lsm5@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #3) > I'm curious, why isn't this just a subpackage of crun, given that this > package has no sources, and exclusively contains a single symlink and some > RPM metadata? Yes, so openshift is looking to enable wasm support and they will likely be pulling in wasmedge from EPEL. For that, we need `crun-wasm` in EPEL as RHEL doesn't want to ship `crun-wasm` without a wasm library being present in RHEL itself. If crun-wasm is going into epel as a separate package, I'd rather keep the packaging consistent in Fedora as well. That's why the stripping out of crun-wasm into a new package. If it helps, I can include a README in the package or a comment in the spec itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2188439 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
