Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=416761 ------- Additional Comments From bradbell@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-30 08:40 EST ------- I have gone back over the cppad rpm with the review check list, just to be as careful as possible before starting the process above. Using the techniques I used to check geoqo.spec, I and found a problem. There are three (special case) files in http://www.coin-or.org/CppAD/download/cppad-20071225.gpl.tgz that had the wrong copyright message (CPL instead of GPL); namely makefile.am mainfile.in omh/license.omh This problem was only in the short copyright message at the top and does not affect the output of the license in the documentation. I can patch the source, but this does not seem like proper procedure to me. I think it is better to fixed this in the upstream version. Would fixing this in the upstream source be OK with you ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review