[Bug 2184592] Review Request: mingw-gsettings-desktop-schemas - MinGW Windows gsettings-desktop-schemas

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184592

Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai |
                   |lplus.org)                  |



--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
  Note: mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
  root/mingw/include/gsettings-desktop-schemas/gdesktop-enums.h
  mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas : /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
  root/mingw/include/gsettings-desktop-schemas/gdesktop-enums.h
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/#_devel_packages


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License,
     Version 2.1", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License", "GNU
     Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later". 105 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/FedoraPackaging/reviews/mingw-gsettings-desktop-
     schemas/2184592-mingw-gsettings-desktop-schemas/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/GConf, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/GConf/gsettings, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/GConf, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/GConf/gsettings
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/glib-2.0/schemas, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/GConf, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/glib-2.0, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/GConf/gsettings, /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/glib-2.0/schemas, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/GConf, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/GConf/gsettings, /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/glib-2.0
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas , mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
     Note: mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas : /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/pkgconfig/gsettings-desktop-schemas.pc
     mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas : /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-
     root/mingw/share/pkgconfig/gsettings-desktop-schemas.pc
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
     Note: %define requiring justification: %define release_version %(echo
     %{version} | awk -F. '{print $1}')
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas-44.0-1.fc39.noarch.rpm
          mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas-44.0-1.fc39.noarch.rpm
          mingw-gsettings-desktop-schemas-44.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
=================================================================== rpmlint
session starts
===================================================================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpmvk_ia71')]
checks: 31, packages: 3

mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gsettings-desktop-schemas/gdesktop-enums.h
mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/pkgconfig/gsettings-desktop-schemas.pc
mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gsettings-desktop-schemas/gdesktop-enums.h
mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/pkgconfig/gsettings-desktop-schemas.pc
==================================== 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0
errors, 6 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 2.8 s
====================================




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 2

mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: no-documentation
mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gsettings-desktop-schemas/gdesktop-enums.h
mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/pkgconfig/gsettings-desktop-schemas.pc
mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/gsettings-desktop-schemas/gdesktop-enums.h
mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/pkgconfig/gsettings-desktop-schemas.pc
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
0.2 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://download.gnome.org/sources/gsettings-desktop-schemas/44/gsettings-desktop-schemas-44.0.tar.xz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
eb2de45cad905994849e642a623adeb75d41b21b0626d40d2a07b8ea281fec0e
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
eb2de45cad905994849e642a623adeb75d41b21b0626d40d2a07b8ea281fec0e


Requires
--------
mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    mingw32-pkg-config

mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    mingw64-pkg-config



Provides
--------
mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas:
    mingw32-gsettings-desktop-schemas

mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas:
    mingw64-gsettings-desktop-schemas



Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2184592
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: SugarActivity, fonts, Perl, PHP, Ocaml, R, Ruby, Haskell,
Python, Java, C/C++
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comments:
Sorry for the delay.
a) Should some of the directories be co-owned, or an explicit requires on
packages which own these directories be included?
b) Should the NEWS and README be packaged as documentation?
c) Should translation files also be packaged?
d) Should %global be used instead of %define ?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184592
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux