https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080743 --- Comment #12 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pemensik/domain/fedora/packaging/fedora/rust-domain.spec SRPM URL: https://pemensik.fedorapeople.org/srpm/rust-domain-0.7.2-1.fc39.src.rpm It seems to be quite strange that the package "compiles" just fine even on the ppc64le machine. It seems to me rust-ring-devel should be architecture specific and should not provide dependencies on architectures where it is known to not build. This way it cascades some workarounds on dependent libraries and has to be solved only by leaf applications, which actually build compilable code. It is not just fault of domain project that rust-ring-devel does not work on some architectures. It should not require workarounds on other packages, which just consume it. Let alone farther in chain. Then the crate dependencies should ensure only people including optional features development headers would get issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080743 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
