[Bug 2182963] Review Request: fonts-compare - Tool to compare fonts for a language

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182963



--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> ---
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "MIT License", "Unknown or generated". 14 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-
     rpmbuild/results/fonts-compare/licensecheck.txt

I see https://github.com/sudipshil9862/fonts-compare/blob/main/LICENSE says
"MIT" license but you wrote in SPEC  "GPLv3" which is wrong then

[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/share/fonts-compare
Why you install like this
install -D -m 755 fonts_compare.py
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/fonts_compare.py
and not just
install -D -m 755 fonts_compare.py %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/

Also, why not write a build-system for your project like using autotools or
Cmake?

[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners:
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, /usr/share/fonts-compare,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/256x256,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable,
     /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16

Same applies as suggested in above point. Why not write like
install -D -m 644 logo/16x16/fonts-compare.png
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/

[!] rpmlint output says
fonts-compare.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fonts-compare
==> This is okay but maybe you want to write man-page for your tool in upstream

fonts-compare.spec:13: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab:
line 13)
==> You can check this in your SPEC editor

fonts-compare.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Fonts-Compare is a tool that
enables individuals to compare various fonts in a particular language.
fonts-compare.src: E: description-line-too-long Fonts-Compare is a tool that
enables individuals to compare various fonts in a particular language.
==> split description line in 2 lines wrapping per line 80 characters


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2182963
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux