[Bug 2178190] Review Request: mmlib - OS abstraction layer and helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178190

Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #3)
> Thank you for the review!
> 
> (In reply to Sandro from comment #2)
> > ===== Issues =====
> > 
> > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
> > => License string appears to be incomplete. See:
> > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/%40fedora-review/fedora-
> > review-2178190-mmlib/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05640709-mmlib/fedora-review/
> > licensecheck.txt
> 
> I think it’s complete. The following are the files for which licensecheck
> detects something other than Apache-2.0:
> 
> *No copyright* NTP License
> --------------------------
> mmlib-1.4.2/src/mmtime.h
> 
> FSF All Permissive License
> --------------------------
> mmlib-1.4.2/m4/mm_python_module.m4

Your explanation makes sense. No action required. I should have looked into the
files myself. Thanks for the extended feedback.

(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #4)
> In the following, README.md and TODO.md have been moved from mmlib-devel to
> mmlib.

I think it makes sense to have these in the main package (and it means one less
warning from rpmlint). Keeping examples/ in the devel package is also okay.

All in all ==> APPROVED!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178190
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux