https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to fedora.dm0 from comment #5) > The files under the directory get marked as documentation, but I can change > it. Ah, then it works, but it still doesn't make sense for Rust -devel packages :) > I notified upstream at the link in the first comment. Should I add the BSD > license text to the SRPM directly? Sorry, I seem to have skimmed over that. As far as I know, just including the license text without the upstream project's blessing is a no-go (unless it's a last resort). In this case, the project seems to be aware of the problem, so they should decide what the correct license text is. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181035 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
