https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149953 --- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Apart adding %doc %{crate_instdir}/README.md, should we ask upstream to fix or enhance something in the Cargo.toml file in order to avoid to manually include the LICENSE file? Yes. They are distributing sources that don't include their own license file. :( The list of files here needs to include a "LICENSE" file: https://github.com/dominikwilkowski/cfonts/blob/released/rust/Cargo.toml#L14 And there needs to be a copy (or symlink) of the file in the "rust" directory. Please report this with the upstream project. Also note that while the project's Cargo.toml references "../README.md" as its "readme" file, this is not really defined behaviour unless the "README.md" file is also included in the list of files to "include". --- Additionally, the "%package -n %{crate}" subpackage is still missing a License tag that contains the licenses that are printed by %cargo_license_summary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149953 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
