https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150362 Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(klember@xxxxxxxxx | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Fabio, Thanks for taking the review and sorry for the slow response! (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #2) > Oh oh, a GPLv3 project without a license file, that's not good. Looks like > the upstream project hasn't been touched in a while, but Felix seems to be > still active in the GNOME community - maybe you know how to reach out to him > concerning issue#1 and possibly also issue#2? Why a GPLv3 project without a license file specifically not good? Is it one of the licenses where it says that the license text must be distributed along with the source? I couldn't find anything that says so in the license text, but it's a fairly long text and I may have missed it. Sure, I can try to reach out to Felix and other rust people that are involved in the project. Is the missing license text a blocker for the Fedora package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150362 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
