https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to fedora.dm0 from comment #3) > It looks like this was done already, but it wasn't published to crates.io: > https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/versionize_derive/commit/ > 55fccd6001946c47185d0d05b19fef11779ce543 Oh, perfect. :) > The crate seems to be used nontrivially, and there are a lot of breaking > changes: https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/releases/tag/2.0.0 > > Is a rust-syn1.0 package acceptable in rawhide if I backport that commit? Look what I found: :) https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-syn1 It's already stable in rawhide, and in "testing" for other branches: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-1f10607303 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-6c1d08e931 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4b82d41463 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-73cf527d8d BTW, the names for Rust compat packages are based on SemVer compatibility guarantees, so it's rust-syn1, not rust-syn1.0. The "rust2rpm --compat" flag I recently implemented should do "the right thing" (TM). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2181033 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
