https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162872 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks, Jerry, for reviewing Sorry for missing this - I was also away for a couple of weeks.. (In reply to Jerry James from comment #3) > I assume those symbols are provided by the Haskell runtime. I think that is correct > - There is no %check script, but the upstream sources contain a tests > subdirectory. Is it possible and advisable to run those tests? The testsuite can be enabled I think. Somehow the packaging tool thought one of its deps was missing. > - Are the unused-direct-shlib-dependency rpmlint warnings normal for a > Haskell package? If not, this library is overlinked. Could this be related with the undefined-non-weak-symbol warning? I don't think it is overlinked. > - Are the static-library-without-debuginfo rpmlint warnings normal for a > Haskell package? I believe it is normal: ghc isn't generating dwarf output. Anyway let me update and rebuild with the newer ghc-9.2.6 (which is built a bit differently to ghc-8.10.7 in F37). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162872 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
