Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-httplib2 - A comprehensive HTTP client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426859 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-12-28 05:07 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 022006c6c5fb75ea082b97d0fcc89d94 httplib2-0.4.0.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI App. APPROVED. SHOULD: make Source URL as http://httplib2.googlecode.com/files/%{name}-%{version}tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review