https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 --- Comment #15 from Link Dupont <link@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- That's expected. The upstream RPM contains the %autorelease and %autochangelog macros. Those macros need to be applied to the spec file when the SRPM is built, in order to include the changelog. The spec file from the contents of an SRPM can't contain the %autochangelog macro, for example, because it doesn't have a git history to read from. So there will always be a mismatch between the upstream spec file (containing the %autorelease and %autochangelog macros) and the spec file included in the SRPM. Would you prefer to review the upstream spec (that will eventually be committed to dist-git) or the generated spec file that includes the expanded %autorelease and %autochangelog macros? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2176241 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
