https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851 --- Comment #10 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I have borrowed an aarch64 machine and tested installing the built package. It is linked to glibc, at least it reports so: # ls -l /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 404040 Mar 10 11:24 /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 404040 Mar 10 11:24 /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so.103 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 404048 Mar 10 11:24 /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so.103.1.0 # ldd /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so linux-vdso.so.1 (0x0000ffff9150a000) libjitterentropy.so.3 => /lib64/libjitterentropy.so.3 (0x0000ffff91420000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000ffff91260000) /lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 (0x0000ffff914cd000) # rpmlint /root/SymCrypt/rpm/fedora/aarch64/SymCrypt-devel-103.1.0-2.fc37.aarch64.rpm ======================================================================================= rpmlint session starts ====================================================================================== rpmlint: 2.4.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 31, packages: 1 SymCrypt-devel.aarch64: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so SymCrypt-devel.aarch64: W: no-documentation SymCrypt-devel.aarch64: W: library-not-linked-against-libc /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so Those are reported on my builds, but yours are not so different: # ls -l /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 469704 Mar 7 19:00 /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 Mar 7 19:00 /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so.103 -> libsymcrypt.so.103.1.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 469712 Mar 7 19:00 /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so.103.1.0 I think the libsymcrypt.so should be made symlink to libsymcrypt.so.103, not a copy. That is a problem to be solved. But they reference at least libc.so.6, so that is probably some mis-detection. Not sure why. But readelf is missing libc reference: # readelf -ds /usr/lib64/libsymcrypt.so | head Dynamic section at offset 0x6f580 contains 27 entries: Tag Type Name/Value 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libjitterentropy.so.3] 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libsymcrypt.so.103] 0x0000000000000010 (SYMBOLIC) 0x0 0x0000000000000019 (INIT_ARRAY) 0x7e788 0x000000000000001b (INIT_ARRAYSZ) 8 (bytes) 0x000000000000001a (FINI_ARRAY) 0x7e790 0x000000000000001c (FINI_ARRAYSZ) 8 (bytes) It is the same on x86_64 build. Other libraries contain also Shared library: [libc.so.6]. Something should be tuned in the build system I guess. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162851 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
