https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 --- Comment #36 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> --- I don't get why there is a libigfxcmrt sub-package out of this project. Is this used by some other component ? My understanding is that library is a fork of this project: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2114125 Now if intel-media-driver is the only user of the library, I don't get the problem to have it bundled at all. It will avoid the need of any ABI computation. Also it will ease the swap between the full featured and Until a solution is found WRT alternative version (https://github.com/intel/libva/issues/639 ), I would be okay to have a downstream patch with the iHD-free driver name added into libva. Please rename as appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
