https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155308 Troy Curtis <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flags| |needinfo?(aekoroglu@linux.i | |ntel.com) --- Comment #1 from Troy Curtis <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Don't forget to include your FAS username on the review requests. The bigger issue is that this package can't be packaged for Fedora unless the binary dll files in webview/lib can be excluded from the package [1]. It seems likely this is possible to do, since I can't imagine Windows DLLs could be used in the context of Fedora anyway. 1: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/what-can-be-packaged/#prebuilt-binaries-or-libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2155308 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
