https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168858 --- Comment #22 from Karolina Surma <ksurma@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I have one more question. The definition of the provided -static package looks exactly like the Packaging Guidelines define (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_packaging_static_libraries): %package -n python3-rapidfuzz-devel Summary: Development files for the RapidFuzz library Provides: python3-rapidfuzz-static = %{version}-%{release} The Provides of the -devel package then look like this: $ rpm -qP python3-rapidfuzz-devel-2.13.7-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm python-rapidfuzz-devel = 2.13.7-1.fc39 python3-rapidfuzz-devel = 2.13.7-1.fc39 python3-rapidfuzz-devel(x86-64) = 2.13.7-1.fc39 python3-rapidfuzz-static = 2.13.7-1.fc39 python3.11-rapidfuzz-devel = 2.13.7-1.fc39 The provides for python3-rapidfuzz-static with the unversioned python and python 3.X are not generated. Should they be? The Python Guidelines say: "For any FOO, a package that provides python3-FOO SHOULD use %py_provides or an automatic generator to also provide python-FOO and python3.X-FOO, where X is the minor version of the interpreter." (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#Automatic-unversioned-provides). Is it the case here too or is this unrelated? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168858 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
