[Bug 248277] Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: mt-daapd - An iTunes-compatible media server


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248277


sergio.pasra@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From sergio.pasra@xxxxxxxxx  2007-12-24 05:55 EST -------
source files match upstream
package meets naming and versioning guidelines
specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently
dist tag is present
the package must meet the  Packaging Guidelines
build root is correct:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
license field matches the actual license 
license is open source-compatible.  GPL included in package. (COPYING)

latest version is being packaged
BuildRequires are proper
compiler flags are appropriate
%clean is present
package builds in mock ( )
package installs properly
debuginfo package looks complete
rpmlint is silent. NO, but the error is intended. OK
E: non-readable /etc/mt-daapd.conf 0640

final provides and requires are sane
%check is present and all tests pass: Not applicable
no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
owns the directories it creates.
doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
no duplicates in %files.
file permissions are appropriate.

scriptlets present OK
code, not content.
documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
no headers.
no pkgconfig files.
no libtool .la droppings.
not a GUI app.

The INSTALL file in %doc contains generic installation instructions and it's not
needed, you may consider remove it. 

APPROVED


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]