[Bug 2168929] Review Request: liboqs - implementation of PQ crypto algorithms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168929



--- Comment #4 from Daiki Ueno <dueno@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Dmitry Belyavskiy from comment #2)
> https://dbelyavs.fedorapeople.org/liboqs-0.7.2-1.fc36.src.rpm is updated srpm
> https://dbelyavs.fedorapeople.org/liboqs.spec is updated spec
> 
> (In reply to Daiki Ueno from comment #1)
> > Notable issues:
> > 
> > - Afaik -devel package shouldn't contain *.so.2 (but .so only)
> Not sure but it can be done if you insist

I think this should be done, otherwise rebuilding dependent packages upon
soname bump will be difficult. The suggestion is:
- the main package owns %{_libdir}/liboqs.so.2 and %{_libdir}/liboqs.so.0.7.2
(the actual SONAME according to readelf is liboqs.so.2)
- the devel package owns %{_libdir}/liboqs.so

> > - Multiple licenses are found; express them in "License:" with "AND" or add
> > justfication
> Done

Good to use SPDX license identifiers for a new package; see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1

Currently it says:
  "License:    MIT and Apache 2.0 and BSD 3-Clause and CC0-1.0 and Unlicense"

which is not recognized:
  $ license-validate -v "MIT and Apache 2.0 and BSD 3-Clause and CC0-1.0 and
Unlicense"
  Not a valid license string

This seems to be acceptable:
  $ license-validate -v "MIT AND Apache-2.0 AND BSD-3-Clause AND CC0-1.0 AND
Unlicense"
  Approved license


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168929
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux