[Bug 2156243] Review Request: python-scikit-build - Improved build system generator for CPython extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156243

Troy Curtis <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Doc Type|---                         |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #3 from Troy Curtis <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Howdy Jasmin! 👋 

It looks like you might be a new aspiring contributor (presuming jasmin is your
FAS username), and so you are perhaps starting work following through the
packaging guidelines
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/). First of all,
welcome and I'm excited to see your motivation to help make Fedora better! A
few helpful hints to get you started:

1. I would start by picking one or two packages, and going through the full
process first. This is more a "go deep" instead of a "go wide" approach. Once
you've gained some experience you'll be more prepared to contribute on other
packages.

2. Note that the fedora-review tool is an excellent resource, but it is only a
starting point. In particular, note how most of the items have an empty box
(e.g. "[ ]"). Each of these empty boxes are there to be manually assessed by
the reviewer (that you! ;) ) The main contribution of the reviewer is going
through this process, and double checking the submitter's work on the packaging
process. Posting the raw output without review is minimally useful.

3. While the fedora-review tool is great, it doesn't always get things right,
and in particular sometimes things listed as issues actually are not.
Especially as you try to build experience with packaging, it is a useful
exercise to dig in to understand how you might fix the issue if you were the
submitter. This could potentially really help out the submitter as well (as
long as you describe your found solution in a comment), but also you might find
there is actually no issue to fix. 

For example, I presume one of the reason this was posted was due to:

```
Issues:
=======
- Dist tag is present.
```

However, in this case this is just because fedora-review doesn't have good
support for `%autorelease` (well it's [fixed but not yet
released](https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/427)).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156243
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux