https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160539 --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the review (and sorry for the delay)! (In reply to Sandro from comment #3) > Legend: > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > Issues: > ======= > [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > ==> License file is from GitHub. This is, for the time being, a neat > workaround. Have you filed a request for the license file to be included in > the PyPI tarball? I couldn't find one. These pypi archives are generated from this master repo, so they've only got the one copy of license that applies to all the stubs they generate, and they don't include it in any of the pypi archives: https://github.com/python/typeshed I've filed this now: https://github.com/python/typeshed/issues/9621 > > [!]: Latest version is packaged. > ==> Version 0.19.1.2 is available on PyPI. Please update. > Updated: Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-types-docutils/python-types-docutils.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-types-docutils/python-types-docutils-0.19.1.2-1.fc38.src.rpm Cheers, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160539 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
