https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161518 --- Comment #18 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Lumír Balhar from comment #15) > Spec URL: https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-y-py.spec > SRPM URL: https://lbalhar.fedorapeople.org/python-y-py-0.5.5-1.fc37.src.rpm > > I have applied all the suggestions and it doesn't build now - the problem is > with the debuginfo package: > > Provides: python-y-py = 0.5.5-1.fc38 python3-y-py = 0.5.5-1.fc38 > python3-y-py(x86-64) = 0.5.5-1.fc38 python3.11-y-py = 0.5.5-1.fc38 > python3.11dist(y-py) = 0.5.5 python3dist(y-py) = 0.5.5 > Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) > <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 > Requires: ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit) > ld-linux-x86-64.so.2(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.17)(64bit) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.18)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.25)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.28)(64bit) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.2)(64bit) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.33)(64bit) > libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.34)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.3)(64bit) > libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_4.2.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) > libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) python(abi) = 3.11 rtld(GNU_HASH) > Processing files: python-y-py-debugsource-0.5.5-1.fc38.x86_64 > error: Empty %files file > /builddir/build/BUILD/y_py-0.5.5/debugsourcefiles.list > > RPM build errors: > Empty %files file /builddir/build/BUILD/y_py-0.5.5/debugsourcefiles.list > Finish: rpmbuild python-y-py-0.5.5-1.fc38.src.rpm > Finish: build phase for python-y-py-0.5.5-1.fc38.src.rpm This looks like debuginfo is indeed not valid / not present. Looking at the build log, the package doesn't use default Rust compiler flags, either (i.e. all `%build_rustflags` are absent from rustc calls in the log). Maybe there's an issue with how you ported the package from maturin to setuptools_rust that makes it ignore the flags set in ".cargo/config"? > The last build can be found here: > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lbalhar/notebook/build/5310880/ > > I cannot remember why I added the %global definition there so I looked at > the other rust packages and it seems that a lot of them have it as well, > I've found 1780 of them. The reason might be that rust2rpm has it in the > template: > https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/rust2rpm/blob/main/f/rust2rpm/templates/main. > spec#_6 > Although I'm not sure what the condition around that macro in the template > means. It means that source-only packages don't get debuginfo. All packages that ship binaries *do* get debuginfo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161518 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue