Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: findutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225753 kevin@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vcrhonek@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxx 2007-12-22 13:03 EST ------- OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. See below - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. See below - License See below - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: a0e31a0f18a49709bf5a449867c8049a findutils-4.2.31.tar.gz a0e31a0f18a49709bf5a449867c8049a findutils-4.2.31.tar.gz.1 OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. See below - Package has correct buildroot %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should build on all supported archs OK - Should function as described. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version 1 bug - check for outstanding bugs on package. Issues: 1. Use either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}, not both. 2. Looking at the source, everything I see is GPLv2+. I think the license should be GPLv2+ for the License tag. 3. Please use the correct buildroot. Other than those minor issues, the spec is very clean... great work. If you would like I can attach a patch to fix the 3 minor issues above, you could fix them, or if you prefer I could just fix them in cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review