[Bug 426167] Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426167





------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-12-22 00:56 EST -------
About the above rpmlint complaints:

The issue with executable documentation is that it has dependencies.
(Non-executable documentation can have dependencies as well, as rpm will
extract dependency information from perl files and such).  What you don't want
is for documentation to force a bunch of additional dependencies that the
package wouldn't need at all if it were installed without that documentation.
In this case the only dependency is the Python interpreter, so that's OK, but
if that dependency makes use of modules, then you have to watch out that future
RPM releases don't gain enough Python dependency generation logic to figure
those out.

Another consideration is that if the script is sufficiently useful that you
expect users will want to run it, you should just package it as you would any
other executable: in /usr/bin, instead of hidden under /usr/share/doc.

You should drop the manual dependency on python; rpm figures that out for
itself in the form of the python(abi) dependency.

You also probably want to remove the comment in the %files section as that's
just an instruction to the packager that appears in the specfile template.

Checklist:
* source files match upstream:
   27b69bf6f1452e8f41577646ddfe78f9528a437409927d5d543bc97d75e27a03
   PyYAML-3.05.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
X final provides and requires:
   PyYAML = 3.05-1.fc9
  =
   /usr/bin/python
X   python >= 2.3
   python(abi) = 2.5

* %check is not present; no test suite upstream.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]