https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158678 Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- This package contains a lot of lib*.so shared libraries used by executables, which lack soname versions [1]. They are required by packaging guidelines. Those libraries are used at link time as a normal library, not as plugins loaded runtime. rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/libcamera_app.so rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/libencoders.so rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/libimages.so rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/liboutputs.so rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/libpost_processing_stages.so rpms-unpacked/libcamera-apps-1.0.2-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64/libpreview.so Such format is usually provided by *-devel subpackages, but this package does not have such thing. I think they are supposed to be internal for the program and they should be placed into %{_libdir}/%{name} with using rpath for this case [2]. It seems those libraries are not meant to be reused by any other tools directly, because no -devel headers allows linking to them. It seems those names do not conflicts with any existing packages now, but those names are not specialized enough. I think moving them to to application specific subdirectory is desireable to avoid future conflicts. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_downstream_so_name_versioning [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_rpath_for_internal_libraries -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2158678 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
