https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159049 --- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I think it should be also recommended to have alternate digest implementation linked from any crypto implementation instead of built-in implementation. openssl or gnutls, maybe even just nettle. common/digest contains own implementation, but reviewed implementation from any reasonably supported crypto library should be used instead IMO. But that would be just nice to have. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159049 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
