https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 --- Comment #31 from František Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) from comment #29) > Please fix the conflicting issue with the full featured. > (likely to requires patching libva, but looks saner than the mesa nightmare > currently occurring). I'd rather not block getting this into Fedora on paralel instability between the full and free versions of the package. A user should always be able to dnf swap and use the full version of the driver as a short term solution, at least since we're now talking about just getting this into Fedora, not default presence in Workstation/KDE/... installations, imo. I am definitely planning to open a ticket against this package to figure out some solution for this issue, should this get approved. There are bunch of options on how to achieve a proper solution, apart from those proposed in the libva ticket ( https://github.com/intel/libva/issues/639 ) and the ticket that Neal created, I had something like what we're doing with wine-dxvk in mind. Short description: wine package creates alternatives handle for various so files with lower priority in post-inst, wine-dxvk adds another alternatives to that handle with higher priorities. The only drawback there that I can think of is that user would have to have free version installed in order to be able to install the full version (the free version would own the alternatives handle, the full version would have a higher priority), but Requires: intel-media-driver-free in the full blown package would easily solve that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942132 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
