https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156237 --- Comment #16 from Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks. Javascript in HTML documentation is contentious and different approaches are in packages available in Fedora. It seems ok for me, at present with man pages, though it maybe good to make some progress resolving this issue. Is it reasonable to remove jquery after the install step and place a symlink to /usr/share/web-assets/jquery/latest/jquery.js ? There seems to be one other bundled library in doxygen https://github.com/doxygen/doxygen/blob/master/templates/html/svgpan.js though this is not used in the generated documentation for rapidfuzz-cpp There are similar issues for other html documentation generation systems. Maybe one could come up with reasonable guidelines to add to Fedora packaging documentation for doxygen? It seems fine for me at this point, but if you want to add html documentation with symlinked jquery.js this would be fine as well. Personally, would advocate for html docs to be in separate docs packages since this allows easy opt out of other software that is often bundled, but upto you on this if you want to ship html documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156237 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
