https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150574 --- Comment #10 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Wayne Sun from comment #9) > Issues: > ======= > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) > for the package is included in %license. > Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text > > > The file LICENSE should have already been included as using > %{pyproject_files}. This package uses flit as a build backend, hence the LICENSE file is included in %{pyproject_files} but not marked as %license, because flit does not support that (yet). To workaround you can do: %files -n python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{srcname} -f %{pyproject_files} %doc README.md %license %{python3_sitelib}...dist-info/LICENSE That will produce a harmless warning about a file listed twice but will work. > This is an issue of the fedora review tool, and already been reported: > > https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/issue/468 Not in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2150574 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
