Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: gvfs - backends for the gio framework in glib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426452 ------- Additional Comments From davidz@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-21 12:31 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Do those config files need to be marked %config? No, I'd even argue they shouldn't live in /etc. > also, I think it would follow conventions better if the libs were broken out > into gvfs-libs / -libs-devel , or if the package was named libgvfs . It's not a libraries in any real sense; it's extensions to the gio library. And the way it's implemented is usually through processes or dlopen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review