[Bug 2153687] Review Request: fapolicy-analyzer - File access policy analyzer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153687



--- Comment #6 from John Wass <jwass3@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Spec URL:
https://github.com/ctc-oss/fapolicy-analyzer/releases/download/v0.6.5/fapolicy-analyzer.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/ctc-oss/fapolicy-analyzer/releases/download/v0.6.5/fapolicy-analyzer-0.6.5-1.fc38.src.rpm


tl;dr; Addressed all findings with exception of the file-not-in-%lang lint,
working on that now. Wanted to get another iteration on everything else in the
meantime.


> [?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
>
> What should we do about vendor?

Reviewed all dependencies, bumped some versions and cut our tools crate out of
the build.  Surprisingly, we are down to two missing crates.  I will submit a
couple bz requests and see if they can be added.

(Note: our vendor tarball contains more entries, but many are just stubs to
satisfy Cargo metadata)



> [?]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
>
> I think this is also relevant ^.

Added a desktop file.



> [!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
>
> Please, use macros instead of python3 interpreter.

Done


> I would also use "tar -xzf" instead of "tar xzf" 

Done


> and "%autosetup -p0" instead of "%autosetup -p1" in .spec 

My original spec used "-p0", so I wasnt sure if you mistyped or misread or if I
am missing it  :)

Unchanged, will update after getting clarification.


> but it's just my personal recomendation.

Appreciate the suggestions.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2153687
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux