https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080 --- Comment #8 from David Shea <reallylongword@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #7) > I see three different license files: > > %license LICENSE.gpl LICENSE.lgpl LICENSE.mpl > > Yet the actual license tag is only MPL-2.0. Why is that? Due to my half-assed reading of the earlier license comment and current Fedora license string expectations. I've put the tri-license back as an SPDX expression. > > BuildRequires: /usr/bin/sphinx-build > > You might generate this dependency based on either the [docs] extras: > > %pyproject_buildrequires -t -x docs > > Or the tox target: > > %pyproject_buildrequires -e %{default_toxenv},docs Done. Used the first one, based on the extras, which does not work in Fedora 36. I can switch to the tox-based one if that becomes a problem. > But note that according to tox.ini, sphinx < 5 is required. That could be > possibly lifted by changing 0001-Remove-the-docs-build-from-setup.py.patch Done. Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dshea/buildsys/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05198418-python-nss/python-nss.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/dshea/buildsys/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/05198418-python-nss/python-nss-1.0.1%5E20210803hg9de14a6f77e2-3.fc38.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
