https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157252 Troy Curtis <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(benson_muite@emai | |lplus.org) --- Comment #3 from Troy Curtis <troy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Yeah it is interesting that fedora-review gave that output even though it is present. However, I was wrong anyway. Using the autogenerated requires is great when a package "uses" a library, but in this case it really should be that devel package should have the fully version dep on the base package. I was getting my wires crossed a bit there. I notice that my syntax highlighting is getting a bit confused due to the backtick used instead of an apostrophe in the description, maybe the fedora-review parser is getting similarly confused? I'm not sure. I highly doubt fedora-review could be made to reliably test for compatibility, as the directionality is very important. For instance, if this was a GPL project, including some Apache licensed software is perfectly compatible. I think it would be very difficult to reliably detect the usage scenario in order to make a proper determination. I suppose flagging potentially conflicting licenses which might need a more careful review would be useful. However, the "here are all the detected licenses" feature seems to mostly do what we'd expect it to do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2157252 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
