https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156091 --- Comment #4 from Antonio T. sagitter <trpost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #1) > Just a quick suggestion for future-proofness / analogy with other Qt > libraries: I'd call the base package qwtplot3d and then the subpackage > qwtplot3d-qt6, which then allows you to add say qwtplot3d-qt7 without > renaming the source repo or requiring an additional source repo. BTW, there > appears to be no BR: qwt-qt6-devel or equivalent? I have re-named this package as qwtplot3d-qt Probably, a Qt5 sub-package could obsolete the `qwtplot3d-qt5` rpm (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #2) > > 5. Change > %autosetup -n qwtplot3d-%{commit} -N > > %patch0 -p1 -b .backup > to > %autosetup -p1 -n qwtplot3d-%{commit} -N I prefer to use the %%patch command apart. Let me work better to this package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2156091 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
