Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libwps - A library for importing Microsoft Works documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=420081 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-20 22:23 EST ------- BTW, this does build OK if you change the build dependency to libwpd-devel. The resulting build has several rpmlint problems: libwps.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/wps2text ['/usr/lib64'] libwps.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/wps2raw ['/usr/lib64'] libwps.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/wps2html ['/usr/lib64'] So some rpath fixing is in order. libwps-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libwps-stream-0.1.so.1.0.1 libwps-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libwps-stream-0.1.so.1.0.1 libwps-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libwps-0.1.so.1.0.1 libwps-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libwps-0.1.so.1.0.1 It's rather abnormal to have versioned libraries in the -devel package, isn't it? Usually those go in the main package and the unversioned .so links go in -devel. libwps-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libwps-stream-0.1.so.1.0.1 /usr/lib64/libwpd-0.8.so.8 libwps-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libwps-stream-0.1.so.1.0.1 /lib64/libm.so.6 libwps-devel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libwps-0.1.so.1.0.1 /lib64/libm.so.6 The libraries link against various libraries they don't actually call. This isn't generally a big problem unless this causes additional dependencies, which doesn't seem to be the case here. Nice to fix if you can, but not a blocker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review