[Bug 426228] Review Request: perl-Class-Inner - A perlish implementation of Java like inner classes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Inner - A perlish implementation of Java like inner classes


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426228


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2007-12-20 16:26 EST -------
Source URL should probably be http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Inner/.

There's usually no reason to put the class name in the summary, since it's
derivable from the package name, but this isn't really a big deal.

I don't see how you came to "GPLv2+ or Artistic 2.0" for the license tag.  All
I can see is that the README says "same as Perl", which is GPL+ or Artistic.

This package puts a file in %{perl_vendorlib}/Class but doesn't own it or
depend on anything that owns it.


* source files match upstream:
   b4dcb388ac32923adbb9d2a501216a4fe039de4d6a447cc163c110826df81467
   Class-Inner-0.1.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
X license field does not match the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Class::Inner) = 0.1
   perl-Class-Inner = 0.1-2.fc9
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(strict)
   perl(vars)

* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=1, Tests=13,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 cusr +  0.00 csys =  0.01 CPU)

X owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]