https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- So the foundry name should be the same as the Vendor ID? It sure would be nice if https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/ would say so if that is the case. All it says is that %foundry should be: "an optional upstream identifier, when upstream publishes multiple font families, with consistent QA rules. Font families released by the same upstream will usually play well with one another. Marking them as such helps users choose good font package sets." Since it is optional, maybe I should omit it altogether? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152347 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
