https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 --- Comment #38 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- > You can have a systemd-boot-x86_64.srpm package which is > exclusivearch x86_64 and produces an empty main package plus a > systemd-boot-unsigned-x64.noarch subpackage. OK. We could do that. I don't particularly *like* the idea, but I guess the update+build would be scripted anyway, so doing it for each architecture would be tolerable. A side-tag can be used so that there's just one update in the end. Before starting work on this: is this important / useful enough to justify the effort? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
