https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152207 František Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(manisandro@gmail. | |com) --- Comment #4 from František Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #2) > > %global debug_package %{nil} > > %{?mingw_package_header} > > Do we still want to do it this way? This would mean that the native > subpackage doesn't get proper debuginfo, I think? @manisandro@xxxxxxxxx Do you have any ideas here? Whenever I drop out %global debug_package %{nil} I get "error: Empty %files file /builddir/build/BUILD/dxvk-2.0/debugsourcefiles.list". (Note that I am moving the .dll files in the spec around a bit and the package isn't mingw- prefixed, compared to other mingw packages). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2152207 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
