[Bug 2149626] Review Request: libertinus-fonts - The Libertinus Fonts project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626



--- Comment #6 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon@xxxxxxxxx> ---
I made some minor changes, the URLs are the same.

Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95078011

> a) Fonts are installed, but not listed as being provided.

The previus koji builds have them included, not sure if this is might be a bug
in the fedora-review?

Provides: config(libertinus-fonts) = 7.040-1.fc38 font(libertinuskeyboard)
font(libertinusmath) font(libertinusmono) font(libertinussans)
font(libertinusserif) font(libertinusserifdisplay)
font(libertinusserifinitials) font(libertinusserifsemibold)
font(libertinusserifsemibolditalic) libertinus-fonts = 7.040-1.fc38 metainfo()
metainfo(org.fedoraproject.libertinus-fonts.metainfo.xml)

My local Fedora 36 build:
$ rpm -q --requires
/home/jonny/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/libertinus-fonts-7.040-1.fc36.noarch.rpm
config(libertinus-fonts) = 7.040-1.fc36
fontpackages-filesystem
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsZstd) <= 5.4.18-1

$ rpm -q --provides
/home/jonny/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/libertinus-fonts-7.040-1.fc36.noarch.rpm
config(libertinus-fonts) = 7.040-1.fc36
font(libertinuskeyboard)
font(libertinusmath)
font(libertinusmono)
font(libertinussans)
font(libertinusserif)
font(libertinusserifdisplay)
font(libertinusserifinitials)
font(libertinusserifsemibold)
font(libertinusserifsemibolditalic)
libertinus-fonts = 7.040-1.fc36
metainfo()
metainfo(org.fedoraproject.libertinus-fonts.metainfo.xml)

> b) Not essential, but if you can build from source, that is preferred when the source is available:
> https://github.com/alerque/libertinus

Upstream uses fontship to build that is not included in Fedora.

> c) Might LaTeX be able to use your package as a dependency to minimize duplication? Maybe there is some issue in how the fonts in LaTeX are packaged?

I think once this font is included in the Fedora repository, then it would be
natural for the texlive package to use this package instead of re-packaging the
CTAN package. I will inform the package maintainers of texlive.

> libertinus-fonts.spec:70: W: setup-not-quiet
> libertinus-fonts.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %build

Fixed rpmlint warnings


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149626
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux