[Bug 2149834] Review Request: tuner - Minimalist radio station player

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149834



--- Comment #3 from Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GNU General Public
     License, Version 3", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or later". 66
     files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/fedora/tuner/2149834-tuner/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[?]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[?]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: tuner-1.5.1-1.fc38.aarch64.rpm
          tuner-debuginfo-1.5.1-1.fc38.aarch64.rpm
          tuner-debugsource-1.5.1-1.fc38.aarch64.rpm
          tuner-1.5.1-1.fc38.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp1b5l041j')]
checks: 31, packages: 4

tuner.aarch64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary com.github.louis77.tuner
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
2.1 s 




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: tuner-debuginfo-1.5.1-1.fc38.aarch64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpo2a4cv0g')]
checks: 31, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
0.8 s 





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 31, packages: 3

tuner.aarch64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary com.github.louis77.tuner
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
tuner.aarch64: W: files-duplicate
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64@2/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/com.github.louis77.tuner.svg
 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings, 0 badness; has taken
2.9 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/louis77/tuner/archive/refs/tags/1.5.1.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
bbb5e7c97da1ee495651d85aca33c2fe58daba81906ae247e12b6a41b1ed7592
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
bbb5e7c97da1ee495651d85aca33c2fe58daba81906ae247e12b6a41b1ed7592


Requires
--------
tuner (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    hicolor-icon-theme
    ld-linux-aarch64.so.1()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgee-0.8.so.2()(64bit)
    libgeoclue-2.so.0()(64bit)
    libgeocode-glib.so.0()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgranite.so.6()(64bit)
    libgstplayer-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgstreamer-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libjson-glib-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libjson-glib-1.0.so.0(libjson-glib-1.0.so.0)(64bit)
    libsoup-2.4.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

tuner-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

tuner-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
tuner:
    application()
    application(com.github.louis77.tuner.desktop)
    metainfo()
    metainfo(com.github.louis77.tuner.appdata.xml)
    tuner
    tuner(aarch-64)

tuner-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    tuner-debuginfo
    tuner-debuginfo(aarch-64)

tuner-debugsource:
    tuner-debugsource
    tuner-debugsource(aarch-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.9.0 (6761b6c) last change: 2022-08-23
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2149834
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-aarch64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: Haskell, Perl, Python, SugarActivity, C/C++, Java, R, Ocaml,
fonts, PHP
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comments:
a) May want to have
%global forgeurl https://github.com/louis77/tuner
%global tag %{version}
at the top of your spec file and the use
URL:       %{forgeurl}

%forgemeta
Source:    %{forgesource}
b) The license seems to be GPLv3 not GPLv3+
c) Some build warnings:
ted in error domains yet
  250 |                 public unowned string get_name ();
      |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    
../src/Controllers/PlayerController.vala:38.5-38.41: warning: Type
`Gst.PlayerSt
ate?' can not be used for a GLib.Object property
   38 |     public Gst.PlayerState? current_state { 
      |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   
Additional warnings:
cpio: redhat-linux-build/AboutDialog.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/AbstractContentList.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
dir
ectory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/Application.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/ContentBox.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/Countries.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/CountryList.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/DBusInterface.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/DBusMediaPlayer.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
directo
ry
cpio: redhat-linux-build/DirectoryController.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
dir
ectory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/Genre.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/HeaderBar.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/HeaderLabel.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/LocationDiscovery.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
direc
tory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/Main.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/PlayerController.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
direct
ory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/PreferencesPopover.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
dire
ctory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/RadioBrowserDirectory.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
d
irectory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/RevealLabel.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/Station.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/StationBox.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/StationContextMenu.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
dire
ctory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/StationList.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/StationStore.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/Theme.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/WelcomeButton.c: Cannot stat: No such file or
directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/Window.c: Cannot stat: No such file or directory
cpio: redhat-linux-build/glib-2.0.vapi: Cannot stat: No such file or directory

d) Assume icons have been made for this project and so are also under GPLv3?
e) It is helpful to do a build on Copr/Koji for all required architectures.
f) Could the files 
%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/com.github.louis77.%{name}.svg
%{_datadir}/metainfo/com.github.louis77.%{name}.appdata.xml
%{_datadir}/applications/com.github.louis77.%{name}.desktop
%{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas/com.github.louis77.%{name}.gschema.xml
be placed in
%{_datadir}/tuner/icons/hicolor/*/apps/com.github.louis77.%{name}.svg
%{_datadir}/tuner/metainfo/com.github.louis77.%{name}.appdata.xml
%{_datadir}/tuner/applications/com.github.louis77.%{name}.desktop
%{_datadir}/tuner/glib-2.0/schemas/com.github.louis77.%{name}.gschema.xml
and also add
%dir %{_datadir}/tuner
to the spec file


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149834
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux