https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430 --- Comment #6 from Michael Catanzaro <mcatanza@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Kalev Lember from comment #4) > Yes, good points. I don't think there is a clear winner here: On one hand it > would be nice to match the upstream "syndication-domination" source package > name, on the other hand making the source package name wildly different from > the binary package can also be confusing (especially when reporting bugs > against the package). Yeah I know. It's your call, but my vote is for "syndication-domination" as it's more future-proof and easier to find the upstream project. But yes, that indeed makes it harder to find the source package from the binary package. There's no winning here. :/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
