https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430 --- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <klember@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Yes, good points. I don't think there is a clear winner here: On one hand it would be nice to match the upstream "syndication-domination" source package name, on the other hand making the source package name wildly different from the binary package can also be confusing (especially when reporting bugs against the package). I'm really fine either way, so if you strongly prefer "syndication-domination" I'd be happy to use that name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2149430 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
