https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143827 Davide Cavalca <davide@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Davide Cavalca <davide@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fedora-review is complaining that it can't find the srpm (not sure why), but this package is simple enough that we can do a manual review. - package builds and installs without errors on rawhide - test suite is run and all unit tests pass (there are no tests) - latest version of is packaged - license matches upstream specification and is acceptable for Fedora - license file is included with %license in %files - package complies with Packaging Guidelines I'd recommend following Neal's recommendation above and using > Source: %{url}/archive/v%{version}/alsa-ucm-conf-asahi-%{version}.tar.gz for Source, but that's not a blocker. This is APPROVED. I will also sponsor you into the packager group shortly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143827 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
