https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143314 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you for comments! Then: a) and d) Currently not only this package but every rubygem-XXX rdoc subpackages bundles these fonts, e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2071826 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2068925 And none of these packags has these license tag. Currently there is slow discussion about how to deal with these bundled fonts on ruby-sig list, however as this is how rdoc files are generated and affects every rubygem- packages, in short, I don't think we should deal license tag issue in individual packages. So currently I want to keep a) and d) issue left as currently. b) Well, what does this mean? (By the way, warnings from %check are from red-colors gem, not this, so I don't think this is a blocker, however rubygem-red-colors are also owned by me...) c) okay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2143314 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
