[Bug 2139799] Review Request: java-11-openjdk-portable - reusable OpenJDK 11 tarball

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139799



--- Comment #12 from jiri vanek <jvanek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
The license must be fixed
the java arches must be honoured

usr/lib/jvm die ownership must be clarified

final porvides are ok at the end it seems (please eyball too)
bundling is ok as per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/JdkInTreeLibsAndStdclibStatic#Build_all_JDKs_in_Fedora_against_in-tree_libraries_and_with_static_stdc.2B.2Blib

the debuginfo is ok to fix later after pkg is done.



Please fix the lciense and java arches in the current srpm and spec file.

Once this is done, please start second spec and srpm, which will be actually
based on fedora specfiles, and will have added portbale tarball logic.  it is
crucial to keep both specfiles/srpms so it can be diffed. TY!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2139799
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux